3701 Note), contracting officers shall avoid, to the maximum extent practicable, using the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process in the case of a procurement that is predominantly for the acquisition of. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. (d) Except for DoD, in accordance with section 880 of the John S. (6) The contracting officer documents the contract file describing the circumstances that justify the use of the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process. (5) The agency determined that the lowest price reflects the total cost, including operation and support, of the product(s) or service(s) being acquired and (4) The agency has a high degree of confidence that reviewing the technical proposals of all offerors would not result in the identification of characteristics that could provide value or benefit to the agency (3) The agency believes the technical proposals will require no, or minimal, subjective judgment by the source selection authority as to the desirability of one offeror's proposal versus a competing proposal (2) The agency would realize no, or minimal, value from a proposal that exceeds the minimum technical or performance requirements (1) The agency can comprehensively and clearly describe the minimum requirements in terms of performance objectives, measures, and standards that will be used to determine the acceptability of offers 3701 Note), the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process shall only be used when. (c) Except for DoD, in accordance with section 880 of the John S. (3) Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. If the contracting officer determines that a small business’ past performance is not acceptable, the matter shall be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency determination, in accordance with the procedures contained in subpart 19.6 and 15 U.S.C.637(b)(7)). However, the comparative assessment in 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. If the contracting officer elects to consider past performance as an evaluation factor, it shall be evaluated in accordance with 15.305. If the contracting officer documents the file pursuant to 15.304(c)(3)(iii), past performance need not be an evaluation factor in lowest price technically acceptable source selections.

Solicitations shall specify that award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. (1) The evaluation factors and significant subfactors that establish the requirements of acceptability shall be set forth in the solicitation. (b) When using the lowest price technically acceptable process, the following apply: (a) The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. 15.101-2 Lowest price technically acceptable source selection process. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal shall merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented in the file in accordance with 15.406. (c) This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. (2) The solicitation shall state whether all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than, approximately equal to, or significantly less important than cost or price. (1) All evaluation factors and significant subfactors that will affect contract award and their relative importance shall be clearly stated in the solicitation and (b) When using a tradeoff process, the following apply:

(a) A tradeoff process is appropriate when it may be in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

Abnormally high number of credit memos